Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption"
Results 681 - 700
of 11,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
Notably, while various data languages can be machine readable, the statute does not mandate that agencies adopt any particular language as part of their joint data standards. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:33 am
Therefore, we vacate the sentence imposed by the district court and remand for re-sentencing [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
Recently, we’re seeing watershed moments in the centuries-long adoption of the use of the pronoun “they” in the singular form. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
Recently, we’re seeing watershed moments in the centuries-long adoption of the use of the pronoun “they” in the singular form. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
After a review of the applicable authority, this Court adopts the reasoning of the Second Circuit and holds that Plaintiffs are not outside salesmen or administrative employees under FLSA. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 8:07 pm
How does it happen that these points are included in a congressional committee report when they’re irrelevant to the legislation at issue? [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:57 pm
The proposal would amend the arbitration procedures adopting rules for expunction of consumer complaints for parties that are not named. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:28 am
Members of the European Parliament also called for a re-balancing of EU-China relations. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:48 am
Courthouse News on April 6 noted:Starting May 4, applicants for patents may pay to have their application expedited through the examination process, according to rules adopted by the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
In re: Elizabeth Hadaway, 2008 Westlaw 755959 (March 24, 2008). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
[A] does not respond to [R's] assertion that it copied the dissenting opinion verbatim; it appears [A] did. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
The Board affirmed the Examiner’s rejection, reasoning that the word “body” is a generic term without structural specificity and that the specification does not define the word and preclude the Examiner’s interpretation. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:16 pm
Now, if you’re still looking for some good excuses, you might want to check out ten of the best I could come up with: “Why You Should NOT Use Technology in Your Trial. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
§1320d-2; In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 493, 497 n.11 (N.J. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:09 am
In contrast, Arizona, which approved medical marijuana in 2010, does not enforce a blood-content limitation in its DUI laws. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:15 am
What does In re Packard mean for post-grant patent practice at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB)? [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 2:29 am
Hilaly's post by George Socha via his blog In Re Discovery. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
GRASSLEY: I know the Declaration of Independence is not the law of the land, but it does express a philosophy of why we went to war and why our country exists. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
In re: the Matter of Adoption of X.X.G and N.R.G., 45 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010), homosexuality is no longer a bar to adopting a child. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 9:33 am
§ 554(b)(3)); see also In re Leithem, 661F.3d 1316, 1319 (Fed. [read post]
