Search for: "In Re Lambert"
Results 681 - 696
of 696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Lynch, 803 F.3d 1165 (10th Cir. 2015) (wrote opinion) Decision of Board of Immigration Appeals inIn re Briones did not apply retroactively to bar alien’s application for adjustment of status. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
But this doesn’t mean that we’re including only violent crimes. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Perhaps now is a good time to re-read in the quite different light of the second decade of the 21st century an interesting foreign observation of American political culture written in the beginning of the third decade of the 20th century--Édouard Lambert, Le Gouvernement des juges et la lutte contre la législation sociale aux États-Unis. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
A recent opinion piece in the National Post by Leonid Sarota and Asher Honickman explained how the rule of law functions: it constrains government and when people perceive it to overstep, they can challenge it; but it also requires individuals to restrain their actions and use the legal sysem and when they are unsuccessful, they must accept it. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the title also indicates, we're not particularly pleased with the outcome.Best involved chemical with the whopper of a name: "2-Propen-1-aminium, N, N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-chloride. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The Library Perspective Vendor’s “TMI” Greg Lambert One of my favorite memories of dealing with a vendor was when I worked for the Oklahoma Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
“Five for fighting” – The National Hockey League’s Liability for Fighting and Enforcers As the season changes to winter, many Canadians turn their attention to the national pastime: hockey. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:01 am
Nearly two hundred years ago today came a night and day that altered the course of Western history. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am
Because you know how “confusing” all that can be when you’re on national television at a public hearing. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
One Sunday each month we bring you a summary from Supreme Advocacy LLP of recent decisions at the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
By Michael Douglas and Mhairi Stewart Andrew Bell is a leader of private international law in Australia. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Justice Lambert’s Reasons regarding the interpretation of section 6(4) in Vance v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
Whoa, what the f*&% just happened? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]