Search for: "In Re Morris" Results 681 - 700 of 1,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2013, 8:30 am by azatty
While you’re there, don’t miss that little button labeled “Donate to MIJ. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:03 am by David Post
”  I think it actually matters a good deal — see here and here if you’re interested in my reasons for thinking so. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
You have to hold this thing while you’re using it, and carry it around when you’re not. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054 (Fed. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:18 am by Jonathan Hummel
“The patent shows that the glasses could come with built-in earphones, which would allow you to listen to music and answer calls while you’re wearing it. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Thomas Conway, Treasurer of the law society, stated, We’re delighted that the Attorney General has been able to move forward with a key recommendation of the Morris Report so quickly. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Law360 (sub. req.)] * Strippers aren’t independent contractors, they’re employees entitled to minimum wage, says a judge. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:11 am
Altria Group Inc., owner of No. 1 Philip Morris USA, has the MarkTen e-cigarette, but won’t divulge its marketing plan. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Likewise, in In re Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, 2003 WL 367739 (E.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:54 am
This is not legal aid work when you’re working for the court, and there’s no reason that only defence lawyers have to work at legal aid rates. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 am by Eric Alexander
  The court rightly, and quickly, rejected this argument based on the Fifth Circuit decision in Morris v. [read post]