Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action."
Results 681 - 700
of 926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2018, 9:00 am
As noted in the preamble of the MDDS regulation, the word “active” represents “any device that is intended to be relied upon in deciding to take immediate clinical action” (21 CFR 8637 at 8644). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:27 am
Too many lawyers who produce high-quality work without much feedback from their peers or superiors expect that their staff can also produce stellar results with minimal instructions or feedback. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:42 pm
To see why, let's suppose that I made the argument that smoking causes cancer, and that I backed this up with a mountain of scientific data and peer-reviewed studies. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:26 pm
It also may be costly not only to share information, but to turn received information into effective action. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:30 pm
Biggest obstacle:] That requesters feel obliged to waive their rights to the letter and that so much thoughtful analysis - and actionable pre-publication feedback - goes unheard. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am
We will review applications and conduct interviews on a rolling basis. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
His professional activities included conducting literature peer reviews, reading journals, observing procedures, and discussing patients with former colleagues. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:17 am
His professional activities included conducting literature peer reviews, reading journals, observing procedures, and discussing patients with former colleagues. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 10:51 am
Greg Lambert 4:37 I know that doing a four member collaboration is not easy in almost anything, especially when you’re essentially I guess I would say peers, but you still need I think probably someone to kind of spearhead things and move things along. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:39 am
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, July 9, 2019, 10:00 a.m.: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing titled, “Protecting Innocence in a Digital World. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
The cause of action – what is “defamatory” Tugendhat J’s ruling last June in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EMLR 25 includes an interesting review of what “defamatory” means. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
In a previous Lawfare article, I explained that a balanced approach is vitally important as the Department of Defense moves forward with implementing the recently published Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan (CHMR-AP). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:36 am
Exactly what would a “good” result from this enforcement action look like? [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
Kansas – Grand Jury Investigates Loans to the Re-Election Campaign of Gov. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
to protect those writing in peer-reviewed scientific journals by means of qualified privilege, and ? [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:47 am
See In re The Boeing Company Derivative Litigation, 2021 WL 4059934 (Del. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
You sit down and review your retirement road map. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
Affirmative Action may be misguided, but a return to racism is certainly not a better alternative. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
Something similar occurs in all situations in which the same subject, through their actions, connects, straddles, or goes through different universes of discourse, different linguistic circuits, different semiotic and experiential landscapes. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Indeed, the FDA still seems wilfully oblivious to the revolution in First Amendment jurispurdence that has since occurred.We’re most concerned with the guidance as it applies to clinical and scientific articles and reprints. [read post]
