Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 681 - 700
of 5,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
The proposed amendment will not, in any way, alter Petitioner’s legal arguments already presented in this matter. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:38 am
Kirkland's attorneys' fees in these matters totaled $162 million. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:30 am
In 1967, the Court heard oral arguments, and on June 10, 1968, an 8-1 majority ruled in favor of the state of Ohio. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:56 pm
Such an amendment would typically not raise the issue of new matter, even when the specification is silent . . . [read post]
24 May 2016, 10:37 am
Such an amendment would typically not raise the issue of new matter, even when the specification is silent . . . [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:19 am
So the 10 exemption clauses under Section 8 of the RTI Act must be imported lock stock and barrel to the WBP Act in Section 4(1). [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm
The Court ruled that federal courts had “subject matter jurisdiction” over questions of apportionment under the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, separate from Article IV, Section IV or the “guarantee clause” of the Constitution. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Constructive realization could potentially be used to justify provisions that look through the business entity if the owners have sufficient ownership and control of the entity, such as in the case of the subpart F rules and, ironically, the MRT, the very provision at issue in this case, which both only apply to shareholders owning at least 10% of the entity. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
I’ve discussed two ways in which they do this – the sweeping “dead hand” argument and appealing to contemporary social acceptance as some sort of ultimate rule of recognition. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Robins, which upheld a state law rule that required large shopping malls to allow leafleters and signature gatherers (a rule that has since been applied by some lower courts to outdoor spaces in private universities[113]); Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
At the hearing the board decided to deal with both appeal cases in consolidated proceedings pursuant to Article 10(2) RPBA. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:01 pm
The amendment with respect to the impugned patent as granted consists in the combination of claims 1 and 3 as granted to claim 1 as amended and the corresponding renumbering of the claims as granted. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
As of today, the status of the 47 breaks down as follows: 38 died due to adjournment or had been rejected by their respective legislatures. 1 was signed into law (Arizona’s HB 2064 on April 12). 8 remain at least theoretically active: 4 in Alabama; 3 in Iowa; 1 in North Carolina. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:53 pm
Rule 43]. . . and the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
No. 1:11-1015 (Aug. 30, 2012). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision ruled in Stern v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
As established in the case law of the boards of appeal, as a matter of principle, the EPC foresees the absolute right to OPs under A 116(1) EPC 1973, but not the right to a telephone interview (cf. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:22 pm
Note that this is a separate matter from the Trump gag order dispute in the federal prosecution in D.C.; this relates to civility in court filings, a matter over which judges have much more authority than they do over public statements by the parties.The post Interesting Standing Dispute in Fourteenth Amendment Section 3 Case Against Trump appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
March 3, 2008): As a threshold matter, defendant lacks so-called Fourth Amendment standing to contest the search of the urine samples. [read post]
