Search for: "James v. Smith"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
In the Smith v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
The first of those cases, Levin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:20 pm
Dist., filed May 9, 2011), and CERT v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
As seven essays in this series note, a highly individualized review of each case is fundamental to Stevens’ notion of due process in the criminal justice system (Jeff Fisher, Rory Little, James Liebman, Diane Amann, Christopher Smith, Lauren Sudeall Lucas, Frederick Schauer). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:30 pm
See James B. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
14.53: Lord Keen QC is discussing the political nature of the Smith Commission in Scotland that led to the Scotland Act and its interaction with the Sewel Convention. 14.46: Lord Keen QC names section 28.8 of the Sewel Convention as the language of “political judgement”. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm
The Press Gazette reports that Lady Justice Smith granted the applicant permission to appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Smith, the justices summarily ordered Arkansas to provide names of same-sex partners on birth certificates. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 8:46 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Judge Smith, meanwhile, wanted to know what specific prejudice the museum would suffer if the case were allowed to continue and not dismissed. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Smith Professor of Law, Professor of Public Administration and Policy and Director, Program in Criminal Law and Policy at the University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:33 am
Smith, 2007-CA-01664-COA (March 3, 2009) [1] Hendrix v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am
Judge James Ho concurred, and Judges Edith Jones, Jerry Smith, and Andrew Oldham concurred with the judgment only. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
-Dallas 2008, pet. denied) (“'Under the FAA, the validity of an arbitration award is subject to attack only on grounds listed in sections 10 and 11 of the Act.'”) (quoting Thomas James Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:26 am
Smith v. [read post]
