Search for: "Jordan v. R " Results 681 - 700 of 889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 9 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles and Saini J continued to hear the trial in Packham CBE v Wightman and ors. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:50 am
The Smith case will be argued for LaRoyce Lathair Smith by Jordan Steiker, with the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas Law School in Austin; for the state, by state Solicitor General R. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:05 am by Robichaud
 This long-needed impetus stems from the recent Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:30 pm
In Washington state Heller Ehrman wrote an amicus brief on behalf of a group of historians in the same-sex marriage case, Andersen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:30 am by Jordan Furlong
I’ll be joined by two high-profile experts in this field, Toby Brown and Kevin Colangelo, in a session introduced by V. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Not only was he not a qualified individual because his Lupus diagnosis prevented him from working in the sun, but it was unreasonable for his employer to restructure the job’s essential functions to create a night shift position (Jordan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:49 pm
Judge Rosalyn Higgins, President of the International Court of Justice, on the occasion of the visit by their majesties King Abdullah II and Queen Rania of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (31 October 2006) Cases currently being heard/under deliberation: Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Alexander J. Davie
Darrell Issa (R – CA), Jim Jordan (R – OH), Jeb Hensarling (R – TX), and McHenry sent a letter to SEC Chairman Elisse Walter, expressing that they are “surprised and troubled” to see the SEC expending resources on a project to force political spending disclosures by corporations while so much of the JOBS Act remains unimplemented (namely Titles II, III, and IV). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am by Melina Padron
R v Peacock: Michael Peacock was charged under the Obscene Publications Act 1959. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]