Search for: "Judicial Correctional Services Inc"
Results 681 - 700
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
This memo was written for an upcoming workers’ compensation trial. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Int’l, Inc., 159 So. 3d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). $1,383.69 formula fee for 31.1 hours of legal work = $44.50 an hour. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
” (Emph added, citing Woodward Park Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
§115(d)(4)(E)(ii)(II)] The provider may seek judicial review of any such termination in U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (“APHIS”). [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
Cast-Fab says it has corrected the problems and is now in compliance. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm
(Correction: Actually, there were three such contracts, because Bolton signed two separate, substantively identical SF-4414s, corresponding to two different sets of Specialized Compartmented Information programs to which he was afforded access. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
You should expect that any legal information the lawyer provides to you will be factual, correct and unbiased. 3. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:39 am
”) Hill’s and Union’s Argument Judicial review of arbitration awards is limited. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
Canada In the case of Sole Cleaning Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Dept. of Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP) - Termination, affirmed. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
In response to questions from the Chief Justice and Justice Scalia suggesting that the Court’s decision in Colony, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am
(quoting Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
When the scientists conduct research that threatens politically correct beliefs, then the scientists must be attacked, diminished, and discredited. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Earlier portions dealt with, among other things, the costs of pseudonymity to the public, to adversaries, and to the judicial process.) [* * *] When we get past privacy and move on to reputational harm—and the economic and professional harm that can stem from reputational harm—the dominant answer is no pseudonymity, except in one important class of cases. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Hunt Transport, Inc., 331 F.3d 69 (2/5/03). [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:12 pm
The committee will hear from James-Christian Blockwood, executive vice president of Partnership for Public Service; Elizabeth Hempowicz, director of public policy at Project on Government Oversight, Rudy Mehrbani, senior advisor of Democracy Fund; and Zack Smith, legal fellow in the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
The Court noted these measures require the Warriors to gather transit use data and coordinate providing necessary required transit, and are backstopped by the TMP’s specific performance standards and the MMRP’s requirement of OCII corrective action. [read post]
