Search for: "L-3 COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS INC." Results 681 - 700 of 867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Metabolife Int’l, Inc., 401 F.3d 1233, 1241 (11th Cir. 2005) (reversing admission of expert witness’s testimony when the witness conceded a dose-response, but failed to address the dose of the medication needed to cause the claimed harm). [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 11:30 am
In 2009, Aflac, Alaska Air, Intel and Verizon Communications had voluntary advisory votes on executive compensation, and all four companies received more than 90 percent support on the advisory vote. [4] With respect to the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) company say-on-pay advisory votes, according to RiskMetrics, most companies received more than 70 percent support on their mandated advisory votes. [5] In the United Kingdom, where say-on-pay advisory votes originated, the average… [read post]
[x] The court found that to hold otherwise would risk disrupting the physician-patient relationship and could cause physicians to make overly harsh decisions regarding impairment limitations. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
  The article below first appeared in the ABA's Magazine, Antitrust, Vol. 26, No. 3. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm by Rita Zhao
” 31 C.F.R. 103.18-20; see also In re Matter of Western Union Financial Services Inc., FinCEN Assessment No. 2003-02, at 3 (Mar. 6, 2003). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal directed the matter to return to the High Court to decide whether the act provides “adequate safeguards for the protection of a journalist’s sources or confidential journalistic material in relation to communications obtained by means of a bulk equipment interference warrant”. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
An enlarged version of this article is going to be published in the Cahier de l’Arbitrage 2010. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
He states that “[t]he scientific community has generally accepted these viewpoints, and scientists regularly use them to assess causality between exposure and an outcome,” and then cites legal decisions only. [read post]