Search for: "MATTER OF A F" Results 681 - 700 of 26,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2019, 4:40 am by Tom Kosakowski
(Ombudsstelle für Crowdsourcing 2019 Report.)Related post: German Crowdsourcing Firms Create Ombuds Program. [read post]
14 May 2018, 5:15 am by Robert Schaffer
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to reject VerHoef's pending application 13/328,201 for a dog harness under pre-AIA Section 102(f) because the applicant “did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:47 pm by Patent Docs
The sole issue on appeal is encapsulated by the question presented: QUESTION PRESENTED: Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that in matters tried to district court, the court's "[f]indings of fact . . . must not be set aside unless clearly erroneous." [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Looks like the defendants’ arguments held water.# # #Matter of A&F Scaccia Realty Corp. v New York City Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
It’s closely intertwined with a variety of economic matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:55 pm by Marie S. Newman
But no matter what is done, you will always stand in the shadow of a brother who was president. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:03 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Fulton,391 F.3d 1195, 1201 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm by Kevin
“I really regret the matter,” he said, though in print you can’t see whether someone is rolling their eyes or not. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Signature Financial Group, 149 F.3d 1368, that processes yielding a useful, The court rejected a patent in Bilski because it wasn’t tied to a new machine and it didn’t transform anything. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:50 am
Demanding a letter of apology claimed to impinge on the individual’s constitutionally protected speechWildman v Marshalltown School District, CA 8, 249 F.3d 768The general rule is that a public employee's right to free speech under the First Amendment on the job is protected with respect to speech involving matters the public interest. [read post]