Search for: "MERCK " Results 681 - 700 of 3,309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2016, 12:12 pm by Anthony McCain
Merck Upcoming Events 2016 HNBA/Microsoft Intellectual Property Law Institute Get a Job doing Patent Law                   Michael Best & Friedrich BSH Home Appliances Corporation Chromocell Workman Nydegger J.A. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 1:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We accordinglyfollow the Second Circuit’s decision in GeorgeBasch as reaffirmed in Merck. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
Merck & Co., Inc. et al, 1-15-cv-00572 (DED March 29, 2016, Order) (Sleet, J.) [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
It addresses declaratory reliefs, jurisdiction to grant them, and delves into the leading case on declaratory relief in patent cases -  ie Arrow Generics Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2007] EWHC 1900. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 However, subsequently, Merck's divisional which claimed the same dosage regime as the revoked patent was subsequently granted. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:10 am by Nancy E. Halpern, DVM, Esq.
As reported in the National Hog Farmer, Merck Animal Health has been granted “licensure of its Prescription Product, RNA Particle vaccine platform from the USDA. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 11:10 am by Gregory B. Williams
Merck & Co., Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 15-560-GMS (D.Del., March 17, 2016), the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint which argued that the patent-in-suit, United States Patent No. 9,067,999 (“the ‘999 patent”), claims ineligible subject matter pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 11:10 am by Gregory B. Williams
Merck & Co., Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 15-560-GMS (D.Del., March 17, 2016), the Court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint which argued that the patent-in-suit, United States Patent No. 9,067,999 (“the ‘999 patent”), claims ineligible subject matter pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:19 pm by Patent Docs
Merck & Cie et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP |… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Taylor, 782 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2015); In re Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:19 pm by Coral Beach
Funding for some of that research came from big drug makers, including Eli Lily and Merck, which  led Democratic presidential candidate Sen. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP |… [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics in IP |… [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Integra; see http://ipbiz.blogspot.nl/2005/06/ap-on-merck-v-integra-decision.html.Lee Cowan did the cover story on Churchill, Manitoba, the polar bear capital of the world. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Volokh Conspiracy has a post titled --The case for patent law and criminal law exceptionalism in the administrative state -- which includes the text:Why don’t courts apply the usual doctrines of administrative law in these areas? [read post]