Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 9,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2024, 2:32 am
Section 12 is derived from Art.7 of Directive 89/104/EEC and, at the relevant time, provided that:A registered trade mark is not infringed by the use of the trade mark in relation to goods which have been put on the market in the United Kingdom or the European Economic Area under that trade mark by the proprietor or with his consent. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:48 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
United States District Court for N.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:36 am
Mark Twain Water Zone, LLC et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – August 3, 2022) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
See, e. g., United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:32 am
The Board pointed out that Belmora was focusing only on Bayer’s commercial activities within the United States, but was overlooking its own use of the FLANAX mark in this country. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Luis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Briefly: In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s oral argument in Yates v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:23 am
Dollar Financial Group, Inc., Cancellation No. 920608880 [Petition for cancellation of registrations for the mark MONEY MART in standard character form for loan financing, check cashing services, not including pawn shop services, and for the mark in design form (below) for pawn shop and pawn brokerage services, based on fraud and on Section 2(d) priority and likelihood of confusion with the identical mark allegedly used by petitioner for pawn services].September 22, 2020 -… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:11 am
United States. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:38 am
Accepting an agreement reached by the parties, the TTAB found that applicant Frasca Food and Wine (FFW) is entitled to a concurrent use registration for the mark FRASCA for bar and restaurant services, covering the entire United States except for the states of Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:32 am
Case date: 12 January 2023 Case number: No. 19-13390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
14 May 2025, 7:15 am
And it provided no evidence of social media followers or customers in the United States as of the critical date. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
"Joneca believed that another company had prior rights to the mark in the United states, and when that company let its U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The most famous derby in the United States is the Kentucky Derby, but the word traces its roots to a 1780 race in England. [read post]
