Search for: "Matter of Campbell" Results 681 - 700 of 1,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 3:51 am
Judge Daniel found the issue of same-sex marriage to be a matter of public concern, noting that, when the cards had been mailed, Colorado had not yet enacted its 2013 law authorizing same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:01 am
For starters, there is no doubt, based on a reading of Securicor and the rich jurisprudence of the English courts on the issue of contractual interpretation (the latest addition to which is Campbell v Daejan Properties), that when interpreting a contract the intention of the parties reign supreme, and blanket rules are to be avoided. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:44 pm
 Under the proposed rule, discovery would be limited to “matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The BIA found that the respondent met the standards for a motion to remand, citing Matter of Coelho, 20 I&N Dec 464 (BIA 1992). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:34 pm by Michael Risch
The one place where we can be sure that context matters is fair use. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The BIA found that the respondent met the standards for a motion to remand, citing Matter of Coelho, 20 I&N Dec 464 (BIA 1992). [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In fact, lawyers and judges may well have been more divided over such matters than ordinary Americans. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:55 am by Dan Bressler
In June, the firm notified the company that it would be representing its direct adversaries: former Hartford employees Michael Campbell and Kiah Jacobs, and their new employer OneCIS Insurance Co. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:29 pm by Samuel Goldberg
Tomorrow, we will discuss the reality of criminal appeals…especially in such a matter. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:51 pm
The fact that Nova knew on January 8, 2008 that the claim involved an accident that occurred on July 3, 2006 "did not make it readily apparent' that it had the right to disclaim coverage" (Ace Packing Co., Inc. v Campbell Solberg Assoc., Inc., 41 AD3d 12, 15). [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 11:13 pm
You won't be executed, no matter what you have done, no matter what the law demands.Much of the research and debate on capital punishment focuses on the deterrence issue. [read post]