Search for: "Matter of S. G. v B. G." Results 681 - 700 of 2,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 12:41 pm
  In any event, the statement of the plaintiff's attorney did not satisfy the requirements of a valid and unconditional tender under the governing insurance regulation (see 11 NYCRR 60-1.1[b]; Doviak v Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc., 63 AD3d 1348, 1356; Levit v Allstate Ins. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:05 am
The decision correctly flags the ripple effect of the Ninth's new holding on FRE 608(b) and impeachment by prior conduct - Osazuwa's holding broadens an AUSA's Brady obligations. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(g)    Conclusion The balancing exercise was not carried out in conformity with the criteria in the Court’s case-law. [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:24 am by Law Lady
WEINSTEIN AND SONS, INC., a Florida corporation, and ABRAHAM RESNICK, individually, Appellees. 4th District.Attorneys -- Disqualification -- Conflict of interest -- Motion to disqualify defendant's counsel in action for breach of non-disclosure agreement where defendant's counsel had represented plaintiff in other non-disclosure agreement matters ten years earlier -- Trial court erred in denying motion for disqualification on grounds of the time that had passed… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:56 am
Carolina Casualty Malpractice Rescission Complaint *Complaint; *Exhibit A; *Exhibit B; *Exhibit C; *Exhibit  D; *Exhibit E; *Exhibit F; and *Exhibit  G. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 3:54 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
(g) If the award has dealt with all the issues and is therefore impeachable otherwise, it does not matter if it was passed twelve months after the hearing. [read post]