Search for: "New York v. Connecticut"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 4:30 pm
The trial of Perry v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:01 am
For background, read the New York Times' coverage of the story back in 1999. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Accordingly, unless the case is brought in the 2nd Circuit (with jurisdiction over New York, Connecticut and Vermont) where such a claim is not likely to succeed, the use of another’s trademark(s) in metatags and keywords is most likely a “use in commerce” and the only question left to decide is whether there is a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Connecticut) and for same-sex intimacy (in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am
As happens in cases between siblings, Savitt v Krinsky 2020 NY Slip Op 31590(U) May 27, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154052/2019 Judge: W. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
In 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the federal appeals court for Connecticut, New York and Vermont, reversed the conviction of a man named Raghubir Gupta, who was convicted of immigration fraud. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:00 am
In 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the federal appeals court for Connecticut, New York and Vermont, reversed the conviction of a man named Raghubir Gupta, who was convicted of immigration fraud. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
Other states, such as Connecticut and New Jersey impose a duty to mitigate on residential landlords. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:16 am
Power Co. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
Employers are prohibited from taking adverse action against workers or applicants’ recreational use in Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, and soon, Connecticut. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:23 pm
Dukes: What The Class-Action Decision Really Means for Employers - Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Dukes v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm
Impact of This Decision As a result of this decision, it is now easier for employees within the Second Circuit (specifically, in New York, Connecticut and Vermont) to prevail on claims alleging FMLA violations by their employers if they can demonstrate that their exercise of their FMLA rights was only one reason why their employers took the adverse employment actions against them. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm
Impact of This Decision As a result of this decision, it is now easier for employees within the Second Circuit (specifically, in New York, Connecticut and Vermont) to prevail on claims alleging FMLA violations by their employers if they can demonstrate that their exercise of their FMLA rights was only one reason why their employers took the adverse employment actions against them. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, are all endeavoring to end “workplace bullying. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:11 am
CKH filed 22 counter-claims against Safe Step including violation of the Federal Trade Commission Rule on Franchising (“FTC Rule”) as well as the state franchise laws of Connecticut, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island for illegal franchise sales and wrongful termination of the franchise relationship. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:14 pm
The parties to the Authors’ Guild et al. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:52 pm
As experienced Social Security disability lawyers representing clients in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, we understand that it's often not one particular impairment, but the combined debilitating effects of a number of impairments that prevent many people from being able to work. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Caronia, 703 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2012), vacating a misbranding conviction on First Amendment grounds; and finally, the Southern District of New York in Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
