Search for: "Nicely v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
The Sixth Circuit provides a nice example of this in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
All of this is filtered through a natural bias toward upholding convictions, resulting in a legal objection that is difficult to apply and a claim on appeal that seems unlikely to prevail.Yesterday's unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:25 am
She emigrated to the United States and went to college and earned a degree in Nursing in 1983. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 9:51 am
The Ninth finds a little light, amongst the gray.United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
In a sea of reports on the state of the (large firm) legal industry, it’s nice to see recognition of their particular issues in Thomson Reuters’ State of US Small Law Firms Survey. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
The Symposium Introduction provides a nice description: In Basu v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
“International relations” was not a basis for distinguishing Bauman(which it refers to as “Daimler”):Daimler is binding precedent from the United States Supreme Court which this Court is bound to follow. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
Nice to be back. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Sure, everyone agrees it would be nice if we had fewer shootings, but we manifestly do not have agreement on how to reach this happy state. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:52 am
Solvay v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
Of the citing cases, CanLII had United Gulf Developments Limited v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
In an end-of-the-term flurry that was not lacking in forceful dissents, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 9:10 pm
As the Complaint states: "This action seeks a declaration that Arizona's recently enacted Senate Bill 1014 (hereinafter Bill) which prohibits the use of the name of any soldier, alive or deceased, on any item for sale without permission of the soldier or their legal representative, violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
United States and its progeny Debs v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
