Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 681 - 700 of 2,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 7:12 am by Paula Lombardi
The plaintiffs have filed their respond and requested that the Court allow their trial to proceed. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
Following Codona v Mid-Bedfordshire District Council (2005) HLR 1, the Circuit Judge found that it was. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am by Ronald Mann
It’s not hard to see where the justices are leaning in Frank v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Daniel Hemel
At first glance, BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2018; Westlake, Hangzhou, China [西湖 杭州])It was my great delight to be able to participate in this year's 10th Annual Conference on "Politics, Law and Public Policy" (第十届“政治、法律与公共政策”年会) (more on that event HERE). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  They were important, to be sure, but Gienapp is convincingly insistent that the Congress that convened in 1789 and made crucially important decisions for several years thereafter (including, for example, responding to the Jay Treaty of 1795) played an essential role in “fixing” the Constitution. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:57 pm by Mark Tabakman
” The lawyer responded that “it’s meant to create a settlement where there are disputes about the facts and what’s owed. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 3:51 am by CMS
In February 2018 the Supreme Court heard the appeal by Haven Insurance (the “Appellant”) contending that it did not cheat Gavin Edmondson Solicitors (the “Respondent”) out of costs owed by six clients represented by the Respondent through conditional fee arrangements (a “CFA”) in road traffic accidents when the Appellant reached direct settlements with all six of the Respondent firm’s clients. [read post]