Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 6,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 4:54 pm
This position was set out a recent case before the Supreme Court (ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 12:40 pm
For example, in Seaboard Lumber Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
Complicity is further contextualized in UNGP ¶ 19 (internalizing the prevention-mitigation principle in enterprise operations); and UNGP ¶ 22 (remediation); UNGP ¶ 23 (context);and UNCP ¶ 24 (prevent-mitigate-remedy and prioritization of addressing human rights impacts).UNGP ¶ 19 adds substantial context to the cause or contribute standard in its elaboration of the prevention and mitigation objectives of human rights due diligence… [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
From Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:04 am
“ These findings have emerged from a reference by the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Provincial Court, Barcelona), by judgment of 15 September 2020, in which no less than six rather detailed questions were raised (para.) 26, with a view to the following facts (paras. 17 et seq.): „17. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
/California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
No. 163 (SCJ, Kelly) at para. 32. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
The decision in State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am
[1] Bloomberg LP v ZXC, [2022] UKSC 5, available here: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0122-judgment.pdf [2] Judgment, para 13 [3] Judgment, para 18 [4] Judgment, para 21 [5] Judgment, para 67 [6] Judgment, para 50 [7] Judgment, para 81 [8] Judgment, para 108 [9] Judgment, para 111 [10] Judgment, para 116 [11] Judgment, para 121 [12] Judgment, para 142 [13] Judgment,… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:24 am
From Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Carl Aveni's decision in Bontell v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Berg v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Docket No. 20-1765
17 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
¶;¶ 37, 38, 48, and 49. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:26 am
Such circumstances are likely to include, but are not limited to, those identified in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446 at para 36 (the so-called “Murray factors”). [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
Canada (Secretary of State) at para 39, clarifying the distinction between “retroactivity” and “retrospectivity,” and stated, [45] Remedial legislation is to have a broad and liberal interpretation: Machtinger v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:12 am
Therefore, and reconnecting to older case law (para. 39), legislation is still valid “with regard to a criterion based on the nationality of the person concerned, … although in borderline cases occasional problems must arise from the introduction of any general and abstract system of rules” so that “there are no grounds for taking exception to the fact that the EU legislature has resorted to categorisation, provided that it is not in essence discriminatory having… [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 5:45 am
Id. at ¶ 49. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
No. 24-2 ¶ 14.) [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
Private nuisance is “interference” with someone’s “use or enjoyment of land that is both substantial and unreasonable” (Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v Ontario (Ministry of Transportation) 2013 SCC 13 at para 18, my underlining). [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am
In another First Department decision earlier this month, the court in Newman v Newman affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
