Search for: "People v. Ball" Results 681 - 700 of 1,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
OF COURSE it’s moderated – you people are not responsible for any legal actions, the paper is… think before you ink“. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(My favorite example of this problem is Posner’s equation in Sex and Reason that can “determine” whether abortion ought to be banned, whose solution requires you to input v, the value of the fetus.) [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:44 pm
  That is why the district court was correct and the Sixth Circuit is wrong in Payne v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm by James Ridgway
  A majority of the CAVC held in Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:54 am by Jamison Koehler
 As the Massachusetts Supreme Court put it so well in Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:49 pm by Adam Baker
That is, just hire people who, as a far as ascertainable by way of past behaviour and personal judgment, are on the ball and not prone to sloppy or careless habits. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
One of the frustrated women umpires, Pam Postema, wrote a book about her mistreatment, You've Got to Have Balls to Make It in This League, a portion of which is worth quoting: Almost all of the people in the baseball community don't want anyone interrupting their little male-dominated way of life. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
Another area that is affected by the machines built-in assumptions are tests done on people suffering from anemia. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Josh Camson
That’s what happened in the case of Charm v. [read post]