Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 681 - 700 of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
Here's what he says:"Doe entered the women’s restroom, which has two stalls, a small one and a larger one for people with disabilities. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:43 pm
Talk about being unknowingly prescient . . . .This opinion was issued on May 12, 2020. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
And that guys like this may well be suspicious.But still. [read post]
25 May 2022, 12:28 pm
Here you go.The case comes out the way most people would expect. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The courts don't like it when people up and leave their jobs and then sue for lost wages. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:09 pm by Walter Olson
Third Circuit drop-kicks “spygate” football-fan class action against New England Patriots [Cal Civil Justice, Russell Jackson, earlier] “Watch Those ‘Jury Duty’ Tweets, People” [Lowering the Bar] Ninth Circuit Kozinski-O’Connor-Ikuta panel rules for free speech in big “hostile environment” workplace-discrimination case [Volokh first, second and third posts; Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:26 pm
 You may well get your sentence reduced.But let's say that, instead of pleading guilty, or losing at trial straight up, you were found not guilty by reason of insanity. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:58 pm
 You may perhaps be granted parole, but the trial court properly found that you're not entitled to resentencing. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:57 pm
  An opinion that, for many readers, may perhaps have more practical import.It's a brief story about a police officer who tries to be nice. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
Especially in a murder case, where there's a lot at stake.Plus, although Justice Greenwood's opinion doesn't mention it, I think there may also be a fairness principle at stake here. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
 We still impart incredible significance in sentencing to chance:  A and B may commit the exact same crime, in exact same settings, but if A's victim falls one way, and B's victim falls another, the punishment we give to identical acts is often radically disparate.P.S. - As to how Ms. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 12:01 pm by Chris Hajec
He filed an amicus brief in support of the government’s cert petition in Trump v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
The only thing that may seem weird is that last enumerated item: "ceramic or porcelain spark plug chips or pieces. [read post]