Search for: "Petty v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm
”[7] Indeed it is true that the extension of universal jurisdiction to piracy, according to Professor Dunoff, “had little to do with human dignity at all; rather, states sought to punish pirates as individuals because they were not (by definition) the agents of any states. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 10:37 am
In Pietrylo v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:47 pm
” (Greenman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 5:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
” Carroll v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
Section 5 is a computer-specific offence and deals with persons who, without lawful excuse, operate a computer within the State with intent to access any data kept either within or outside the State, or outside the State with intent to access any data kept within the State, whether or not any data is actually accessed. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
when undertaken by other states. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 2:18 pm
" In NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:43 am
In Ostergren v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:28 pm
The Illinois State Bar Association fought hard against the bill, arguing that the bill was unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 12:25 pm
If there is a history it will displayed at the bottom of the page as what is called a Short Caption that says Comm. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court established the constitutional basis for using paid informants in 1966 with U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:50 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
