Search for: "Powers v. Taylor"
Results 681 - 700
of 874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2016, 2:15 am
They’re incredibly powerful. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
Last week in the courts On Monday 12 to Thursday 15 December 2022 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Aaronson (aka “Dominic Ford”) v Stones (aka “Mickey Taylor”) (QB-2021-001538). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:35 am
Twitter, Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.10 The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,11 the… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.[10] The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,[11]the powers… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
The court explained that in this instance the appointing authority was not authorized to designate another individual to receive an employee's written resignation in lieu of the resignation being delivered to him.10 The Appellate Division's decision noted that although the heads of other departments in the jurisdiction were specifically authorized to delegate the power to receive the delivery of an employee's resignation to a designated individual,11 the… [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Journalism and regulation Following the Daily Mail’s successful night at the Press Awards, the New Yorker has published a lengthy feature on the Daily Mail’s rise to “the most powerful newspaper in Britain“, available here. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
Mulcaire alone pleaded guilty to five further substantive counts in respect of Max Clifford, Andrew Skylet, Gordon Taylor, Simon Hughes and Elle MacPherson. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
One cannot answer that question strictly as a matter of public policy because the First Amendment right to free speech places limits on government’s power to make lying a crime.In United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
CERBCO, Inc., 676 A.2d 436, 445 (Del. 1996) ('Delaware law dictates that the scope of recovery for a breach of the duty of loyalty is not to be determined narrowly.'); Taylor v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:39 pm
” Etc.In the 1969 case of Powell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm
Matthew Taylor of the MTPT blog has a very interesting piece... [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Christina Taylor Green. [read post]
