Search for: "Randy Barnett" Results 681 - 700 of 1,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) A few weeks ago, I testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Turk (and see here how he applies this to the particular issue involved in that case, which is federal constitutional limits on state punitive damages awards); the opinion cites our own Randy Barnett many times: [I.] [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Volokh readers will remember when two widely-respected conservative Court of Appeals judges, Judge Easterbrook and Judge Posner were on a unanimous Seventh Circuit panel denying both the Due Process and Privileges or Immunities challenge to Chicago’s hand-gun ban. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) I thank Orin for his thoughtful response and believe I understand much better our areas of disagreement. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
The piece is complex and much can and has been said about it by it other theorists but I want to focus (again) on one aspect of the article that I wrote about previously because that part of Professor Solum's article was also used by Professor Randy Barnett in his recent and interesting review of Adrian Vermeule's book "Common Good Constitutionalism. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:48 am
But I think they’re a dumb idea — supporters would be better off getting behind Randy Barnett’s constitutional proposal, which is much more likely to make a difference. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm by David Lat
., John Roberts, Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Nicholas Rosenkranz, Obamacare, Orin Kerr, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Piers Morgan, Politics, Randy Barnett, Rick Hasen, SCOTUS, Supreme Court [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 6:16 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Meanwhile, on the subject of constitutional conventions and amendments, there’s also this new issue of the Tennessee Law Review, featuring contributions by everyone from Richard Epstein to Sanford Levinson to Randy Barnett. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 6:35 pm
Perhaps there will be a part for co-conspirator Randy Barnett, who has previous experience appearing in sci fi/fantasy roles. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Last night, Randy Barnett debated Jeff Rosen on whether the Constitution protects economic liberty. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) A few weeks ago, I blogged about oral argument in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals in the Seven-Sky v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:50 pm by David Bernstein
” (Holmes, not coincidentally, was by far the Justice least willing to question segregation laws in his heyday.)In short, until folks like Richard Epstein and Randy Barnett upset the apple cart, modern constitutional debate, especially with regard to the Fourteenth Amendment, was a battle between New Progressive ideology advocated by modern liberals, and Old Progressive ideology advocated by modern conservatives.There is nothing actually conservative, however, about Old… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm by David Kopel
Well worth reading is Randy Barnett’s Heritage Foundation monograph on the constitutional issues. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
Tech Industry Calls for Surveillance Reform” [Corporate Counsel, EFF, Marvin Ammori/USA Today] New Federalist Society symposium on NSA/FISA surveillance and bulk data collection includes names like Randy Barnett, Jim Harper, Jeremy Rabkin, Stewart Baker, Grover Joseph Rees [Engage, Randy Barnett] Nowadays “law enforcement can feel free to admit their traffic stops are pretextual” Thanks, Drug War! [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
FISA strains Fourth Amendment [Julian Sanchez] Paging Akhil Amar: Romney on Meet the Press says “I am as conservative as the constitution” [Tucson Citizen] Randy Barnett vs. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 11:57 am by Tom Smith
So-called “substantive due process” has long been criticized progressives and conservatives as a contradictory interpretation of the Due Process Clauses, and one that undermines the popular sovereignty of We the People to govern themselves. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 10:34 am by David Kopel
Personally, I prefer textbooks which put their subject in historical context and order, which is one of the reasons I use Randy Barnett’s textbook for Con Law I and Con Law II. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:54 am by Ted Frank
"Unions flexing their corporate-governance muscle" [Copland @ Examiner] Randy Barnett on the med-mal reform bill and federalism. [read post]