Search for: "Register Publishing Company v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Employer v employee Theft of IP and other sensitive information from companies is very common. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
The term fair use originated in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide services… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
(Spicy IP) MANJAL removed from trademark register (Spicy IP) Outsourcing Indian patent searches to CSIR: Insourcing conflict? [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
” Pierce v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
United States Post Office, 39 U.S. 728 (1970). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
United Fabric appeals.The big problem with this analysis, however, is that registered copyrights are presumed valid. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
Professor Wong also stated that even though a private company is handling these licences, it may be no bad thing for the US to experience a licensing system. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
(PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches websites to discuss patent and trademark procedures (inovia) US Patent Reform Will patent reform come up in a big way in the 112th Congress? [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
Shortly thereafter, it filed a trademark application for “APP STORE” in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 4:11 pm
And as the Supreme Court said in Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
A copyright owner who uses a US company to manufacture its goods cannot, after the first sale, prohibit the re-importation of those goods into the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:12 pm
Thus in Kenedi v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:57 am
Part I examines the legal framework governing arbitration in the United States, including New York Convention and Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am
Considers the implications for companies of the finding that in-house lawyers are not protected by legal professional privilege. [read post]
