Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 681 - 700
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
The following is a guest post from Anita Krishankumar: Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion in Sykes v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:09 pm
Nor do I believe in the continuing viability of the constitutional compact-based justification for judicial review first offered up by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:25 pm
The case was Stokes v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:02 pm
" This is also made clear in the 1988, Texas Supreme Court case, Vail v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
In his 1989 dissent, as now, Stevens appeared to be motivated, at least in part, by his keen sense of patriotism, enhanced by his service in the U.S. military in World War II. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:19 am
Jed Graham, writing at Investor Business Daily's Capital Hill blog, makes this keen observation:"[V]irtually no one understands what the law means or how premium subsidies will grow over time — and it’s a near certainty that the confusion extends to the members of Congress who voted for it. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:10 pm
., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:40 pm
" Heskin v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
In respect of the former, his Lordship referred inter alia to the decisions in Sentges v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:32 pm
Gas Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Div. 1996) Keene Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
We have also learned that Jim Beck has a keen knowledge of The Rolling Stones. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
On 1 March 2011, permission to appeal was refused on the papers (by Sir David Keene) in the case of Wallis v Meredith. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
Regardless of the questionable merit of the Westboro Baptist Church's activities, its legal win - Snyder v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
” (Judicial Watch, through separate litigation (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
