Search for: "STATE v. SPEED'S, INC." Results 681 - 700 of 978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am by admin
(internal cites deleted) DiQuisto v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Kevin
App. 1970) (finding no contributory negligence by prison guard who fell off doghouse in back of truck after an "unannounced right-angle turn" at high speed) State Farm Gen. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Considering the intellectual vacuum the Center had to fill, and the speed with which it had to work, the first edition was a stunning accomplishment. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
California High Speed Rail Authority (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 314)? [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Sara Spaur
Circuit recently reminded the agency in Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
– General Court rejects appeal concerning speed reducing gearbox Case T-246/10 Francisco Ivars v OHIM – Motive intervening (Class 99) Nike in General Court: DYNAMIC SUPPORT and VICTORY RED: T-512/10, T-356/10 (Class 46) General Court: PIPELINE and absolute grounds: T-87/10 (Class 46) Is territoriality dead? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]