Search for: "STATE v. TAYLOR"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Minnesota is one of only a handful of states with third degree murder on the books. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
* See Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently addressed how specific the link between client identity and advice given must be in order to constitute a disclosure of the substance of the legal advice provided to clients by their attorneys in Taylor Lohmeyer Law Firm P.L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
State v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am
Johnston's opinion yesterday in Williams v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Thomas Jefferson’s understanding of the Constitution and republicanism is understood in contrast to John Taylor’s and William Manning’s. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:05 pm
On May 1, 2020, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
