Search for: "Samuel Anthony Alito" Results 681 - 700 of 1,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 8:37 am by Michael Fox
The dissenters were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 5:57 am by Kalvis Golde
Both cases were decided by a 5-4 vote, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in the majority. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:46 am by Amy Howe
  But the Court’s four more conservative Justices seemed to be just as solidly opposed to it:  Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, for example, both were troubled by the fact that some of the states which are required to get preclearance now have better voting records than states that do not need preclearance. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:09 am by Staci Zaretsky
The Legal Times has more on the grammatical and stylistic discord that occurred in those pages: Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court (and joined by Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel Alito Jr., Anthony Kennedy, and Antonin Scalia), concluded that the Kansas statute was not unconstitutional. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:45 pm by Zoe Tillman
The justices in the majority include Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:56 pm by Lyle Denniston
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M.Kennedy, and Sonia Soitomayor. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:12 am
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:21 am by HR Hero Alerts
The other three justices — Sandra Day O’Connor, John Paul Stevens, and David Souter – have been succeeded by Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, respectively. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
But Justice Anthony Kennedy countered that Pincus’s proposed rule would make it difficult for courts to draw a line between what is and is not allowed. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:10 am by Ronald Mann
Moments later, Justice Samuel Alito took the discussion back again to the same simple question from which Kennedy had started: “So why shouldn’t the … exemption be applied to the transfer that the trustee is seeking to avoid, as opposed to intermediate transfers that … are not constructively fraudulent? [read post]