Search for: "State v. Brady" Results 681 - 700 of 1,538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to Devereaux’s contention, the allegedly defamatory statement made by Burrows was not actionable because it was absolutely privileged as a matter of law (see Brady v Gaudelli, 137 AD3d 951, 952; El Jamal v Weil, 116 AD3d 732, 734; Bisogno v Borsa, 101 AD3d 780, 781; Kilkenny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP, 76 AD3d 512, 513), and does not support a finding of a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Seldon… [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:49 am by Viking
Cain 1) Whether there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of Smith’s trial would have been different but for Brady and Giglio/Napue errors; 2) whether the state courts violated the Due Process Clause by rejecting Smith’s Brady and Giglio/Napue claims. 12.6 10-8505 Williams v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
  It may have saved Tom Siller 30 years, as last week the 8th District, in State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:21 am by WSLL
Brady imposes an affirmative duty on the prosecutor to learn of favorable evidence in the State’s control and divulge such evidence to the defendant. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:42 am by Michael M. O'Hear
 But that weakness is itself only a product of the Court’s own prior decisions in Brady v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:47 am by Theodore Harvatin
Brady Violations and Illinois Law Pursuant to the ruling set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:37 pm by KC Johnson
But Hudson then went further, and held that Nifong violated a 1959 case called Napue v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:22 am by David Oscar Markus
Here, Defendant asserts that, under Brady v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The MP story notes this in passing, declaring that, "Now, the politics show signs of shifting, and a renewed effort is underway to push the legislature to overhaul state discovery rules, following the example of traditionally more conservative states such as North Carolina and Texas. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Supreme Court Sides with Vaccine Manufacturers in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Branker, No. 0171p.pdf In a conviction and death sentence for capital murder, denial of petition for federal writ of habeas corpus relief is affirmed where: 1) the state motion for appropriate relief (MAR) court's determination that production of the undisclosed evidence would not have resulted in a different verdict, either at guilt or sentencing, in petitioner's trial for the murder was not an unreasonable one; 2) given the similarities in the murders, the evidence that the same… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
 See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 16; Brady v. [read post]