Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 681 - 700 of 13,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm by Bill Marler
Well, first, don’t eat British Columbia, Canada oysters for a bit. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 5:24 pm by Russell Knight
R. 214(c) You will not have too much success saying, “this is too old. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
Canada The Michael Geist blog has an article criticising the Government’s defence of the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11). [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Rose Hughes
 According to the Board of Appeal, there is long-established case law interpreting Art. 84 EPC as requiring the entirety of the description to be consistent with the allowable claims (T 0977/94, r. 6.1; T 0300/04, r. 5; T 1808/06, r. 2). [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The story of how Indigenous peoples were included within the state could be avoided with bland statements—such as, “there was from the outset never any doubt that sovereignty and legislative power, and indeed the underlying title, to [Aboriginal] lands vested in the Crown” (R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075, Dickson C.J. and La Forest J. at 1103). [read post]