Search for: "State v. Cherry"
Results 681 - 700
of 736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 12:47 pm
Emerging areas in Psychology, Data, and Statistical Sciences Gary Marchant, Lincoln Professor of Emerging Technologies, Law and Ethics, at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, moderated panelists: Xiao-Li Meng, the Whipple V. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Box 272 Newport, PA 17074 Phone: (717) 567-7125 Alternatives Carlisle 20 East North Street Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 960-0140; (717) 960-0149 Fax: (717) 960-0146 Alternatives Lewistown/Service Coordination 3 Monument Square, Suite 100-102 Lewistown, PA 17044 Phone: (717) 247-8291 Fax: (717) 247-8293 Alternatives East/Home Based Services/Capital Connections 401 Division Street Harrisburg, PA 17110 Phone: (717) 214-3023 Fax: (717) 214-3027 UCP of Pittsburgh 4638 Centre Avenue… [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:04 pm
`(a) New Chemical Substances and New Uses of Chemical Substances- `(1) NEW CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES- Except as provided in subsection (d), no person may manufacture or process a new chemical substance unless-- `(A) the person submits to the Administrator a notice, in accordance with subsection (c), of the intention of the person to manufacture or process the substance; … [read post]
13 May 2017, 10:22 am
The case, which has gained this recent notoriety is Lois Slemp v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:35 pm
Amanda Rice argues remotely in Lange v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
Live checks have been banned/restricted in at least 6 states as too misleading. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:53 pm
For your convenience, there are four Petro Cohen office locations in southern New Jersey, including Cherry Hill, Hamilton, Northfield, and Cape May Court House. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:48 am
OCTOBER The Masters Conference October 4-6, 2010 Washington, DC Click here for more information. 2010 NFPA Annual Convention October 7-10, 2010 Cherry Hill, NJ Click here for more information. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:59 pm
I’m interested in one sentence buried deep in the report: After the decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in Saskatchewan Federation of Labour v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:16 am
Thoughts from the Digital Samurai - http://tinyurl.com/34qvgqs Texas State Bar Releases 63,000 Lawyer E-Mail Addresses to Law Student - http://ow.ly/18ENnA What Lawyers Need to Know About Search Tools - http://tinyurl.com/2clo7kg Worldmark v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:36 am
A more moderate response came from Joel Brenner, who compared the report to a fruitcake, “chock full of tasty cherries—and other bits that are nuts. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am
The most common Advertising Rule deficiencies observed include: (i) misleading performance results, caused by lack of sufficient disclosures, (ii) misleading one-on-one presentations, (iii) misleading claims of compliance with voluntary performance standards, (iv) cherry-picked profitable stock selections, (v) misleading selection of recommendations, and (vi) failure to implement compliance policies and procedures designed to prevent non-compliant advertising practices. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am
Go after all of them, don’t cherry pick. [read post]
