Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 681 - 700 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2011, 4:03 am
"But then, midway through the opinion, I discover that it sort of is big of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Marci Hamilton
The push by conservative religious entities like the Becket Fund and the Alliance Defending Freedom since the 1990 Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:03 am by Sam Hasler
WOLSHIRE, 905 NE 2d 1051 (Ind Court of Appeals 2009) and suggest that you think long on it:We reach the same conclusion with regard to the trial court's division of Husband's future military retirement benefits. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In previous unpublished rul- ings, this court has applied a district court's ethical rules to determine whether counsel should be disqualified on appeal. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 6:28 am
This post deals with an opinion recently issued by the Court of Appeals of North Carolina:  State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
In Ramirez, the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) reversed an order denying class certification of UCL and Rees-Levering Act claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:24 pm by Christopher Simon
" The decision of the Bibb County State Court was appealed to the Georgia Court of Appeals and apparently the 4th division affirmed the trial court in an unreported opinion. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 12:40 pm by Andrew Delaney
Then plaintiff sued defendant in state court for an enforcement-of-judgment action. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals seemingly rejected this “sniff plus” approach in the recent case of State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:19 am by Douglas Reiser
  I hope the Washington Supreme Court reverses the Division Two decision and establishes clarity on the issue of resultant loss. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 5:11 pm
The New York Court of Appeals, 1st Division recently upheld a lower court ruling that a series of "signed" emails is a sufficient writing to modify a contract. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
(Justice Richman was, in fact, only appointed to the Court of Appeal last year.) [read post]