Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 681 - 700 of 10,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht and Rachel E. Mossman
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Mary L. Dudziak
With nations in Africa and Asia poised to gain independence, the United States hoped the new countries would follow its lead. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by Erin Miller
  With nations in Africa and Asia poised to gain independence, the United States hoped the new countries would follow its lead. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:04 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, issued a five page opinion on September 15, 2011 denying the plaintiffs’ efforts to gain control over the artifacts to satisfy their multi-million dollar court judgment against the government of Iran.Jenny Rubin and several other Americans were injured in Jerusalem after Hamas carried out three bombings. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
In Aug. 2014, with IS making rapid territorial gains and committing heinous atrocities, the Obama administration took the first steps toward a direct U.S. military campaign. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]