Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 681 - 700 of 23,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
David Frederick began arguments for the state of Maine with a lengthy exchange with the Chief Justice and Justice Alito, both of whom were hard pressed to find a distinction between this case and Riegal v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am by Kevin Kaufman
The relatively recent expansion of sports betting in the U.S. is a result of the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 11:06 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
After reviewing the facts and holding in Ramirez, we discuss how the decision clarifies the concrete harm requirement established by SCOTUS’s Spokeo decision, Ramirez’s implications for class action and individual lawsuits alleging violations of federal consumer financial protection laws, and the potential impact on state court litigation. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 12:06 pm by Ashley Binetti
” Links: NWC Amicus Brief. 5th circuit decision in State Farm v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by djackson
Passing these types of laws has been a recent trend in the states, spurred by those who want to see Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]