Search for: "State v. Hughes" Results 681 - 700 of 1,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
  It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm
If you live, as I do, in southern California, you are surrounded by USC alums and supporters. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Damages are not capped in the United States or in Canada, New Zealand or South Africa. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He is also incorrect to suggest that it makes any difference whether an appellate court, when rejecting an Edwards v Bairstow challenge, expresses its agreement with the conclusion of the fact-finding tribunal or states only that the tribunal was entitled to reach that conclusion on the material before it. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:18 am by Jim Walker
  John Hughes Clarke, head of the UNB’s ocean mapping group, stated at the time of the grounding that the problem was that cruise ships "want to go off the safe shipping lanes where there is more dramatic topography or stunning wildlife," in order to be of interest to the paying passengers. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by Benjamin Goh
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Christina Koningisor
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Chesney
In my previous post, I explored the extent to which the Munaf v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
In a 5-4 decision, the Hughes court overturned a decision from the previous year, now stating that the establishment of minimum wages for women was constitutional. [read post]