Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 681 - 700
of 29,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2018, 4:43 am
Accordingly, the petitioner’s contention that the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of promoting agriculture exceeded the Town Board’s zoning powers is meritless Calverton v Town of Riverhead, 2018 WL 1833207 (NYAD 2 Dept. 4/18/18) [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:13 pm
A settlement has been reached in Barnes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:57 pm
State Complaince Plans State can elect from a variety of strategies to meet these goals. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Plan, 2016 NY Slip Op 04473, Appellate Division, Third Department [See, also, 2016 NY Slip Op 04472, http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_04472.htm, granting NYSHIP’s motion to reargue the court’s decision.]Roslyn Teachers Assn. v New York State Health Ins. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:22 pm
The Court acknowledged that the language in the letter to stockholders that accompanied the proxy statement did urge approval of the Plan and stated that the Original Awards would vest "only ifperformance conditions are achieved. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:12 am
Campbell and James V. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:10 am
She stated she counseled him to maximize his retirement benefits, and therefore she should be entitled to half of the $1.2 million. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
In Dietz v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
Art 23 provides that the Member States must submit an air quality plan for approval by the Commission, when the levels are exceeded in a particular zone, indicating how the limits will be met. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
In Sharpe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:26 am
The Eighth Circuit's decision in Braden v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
The Court stated: “Therefore, even assuming, without deciding, that the 1997 EIR for the Airport Master Plan constitutes a program EIR, as CAAP argues, we are not persuaded that the proposed changes to the Airport Master Plan that are addressed in the eighth addendum constitute a new project that requires a new EIR. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:20 pm
Blake v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:42 pm
The 2019 Arkansas ruling in Little Rock Planning Services v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:50 pm
Biden v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
" So saying, Wilder commented that _Romer v. [read post]
