Search for: "T. R. T."
Results 681 - 700
of 302,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
t’s not the $2 billion. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
” (T 728/98 [3.1]).The latter applies to the feature “average particle size” in the present case […].[2.5] For these reasons claim 1 of the main request and of auxiliary request II is unclear.So when you cite a standard, it might be a good idea to actually have a look at it. ;-)To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
If you are an investor that has suffered losses investing with Eric T. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:02 pm
A decision contains an obvious mistake if the text thereof is not and obviously cannot be what the Board actually intended (see T 1093/05 [7]). [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 1:08 pm
THIS DOESN'T REASSURE ME ABOUT THEIR QUALITY OF SERVICE: AT&T's new user agreement forbids public disparagement of AT&T. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the… [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:43 am
AT&T says it doesn't sell or collect the internet usage data of its customers, but won't disclose how long it retains logs of subscribers' IP addresses, what its position on data retention is or whether it has been in contact with the Justice Department. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
Even if this reasoning has not been included as formal ground in the decision under appeal - though it could and should have been (the underlying need for procedural economy would not require the reasoned statement of a communication under R 71(2) to cover “all the grounds against the grant” unless the reasoning of a first instance decision under R 111 were equally comprehensive) - it is evident that a first instance consideration of the issue of inventive step has… [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 4:41 am
JOBS AMERICANS WON’T CAN’T DO. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
It is not appropriate to express on the one hand a preliminary opinion in the annex to the summons sent by virtue of R 71a EPC 1973, as required by the Guidelines for Examination (E-III, 6), setting a time limit for filing any submissions expiring 19 March 2007 and on the other and not to admit such submissions and their supporting evidence filed 14 March 2007, i.e. before the set date, without reflecting on the question whether they were a reaction to the OD's opinion (see in this… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, they deal with questions that are different from the present case and, consequently, are not relevant.For the reasons given above, the Board comes to the conclusion that the opposition complies with the requirements of A 99(1) EPC 1973 and R 55a) EPC 1973, which were in force at the time when the opposition was filed and, therefore, are to be applied (see T 1366/04 [1.2]).Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.To have a look at the… [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 pm
This “title of the invention” is also part of the abstract (R 47(1)). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 2:15 pm
I started reading this discussion:I don't like Trump, and I didn't vote for Trump... but I support T_D wholeheartedly for one reason. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:01 pm
T 488/94, T 169/96 and T 345/98). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
T 727/00 [1.1.4], T 686/99 [4.3]).Auxiliary request 1[2.2] The reasons under [2.1] also apply to claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 because this claim contains all the features of the main request that are relevant for the above argumentation […].Auxiliary request 2[2.3.1] In claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 the insecticide was further limited to the compound imidacloprid […]. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The author notes that the case law relied upon, T 609/02, dealt with Swiss-type claims. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
Sa dernière requête principale n'avait pas été admise par la division d'examen en application de son pouvoir d'appréciation selon la règle 137(3) CBE.Avec son mémoire de recours, le demandeur a [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 10:00 am
Rеmеmbеr, уоu dоn’t juѕt tеll the IRS thаt уоu аrе рауіng іn іnѕtаllmеntѕ. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, they are not to be objected to under R 86(4) EPC 1973.[2.3] On the other hand, the decision […] explains that the original claims 1 to 9 on one hand and claim 1 according to both requests on the other hand solve different and technically unrelated problems with respect to the prior art. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:42 pm
The ones that don’t turn away, he deems fit to move in with him. [read post]
