Search for: "Temple v. Temple" Results 681 - 700 of 1,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2013, 7:59 am by Rick St. Hilaire
As arguments heat up in the civil forfeiture case of United States of America v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Dr Paul Wragg is a lecturer in law at the University of Leeds and an academic fellow of the Inner Temple. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:13 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 120361 (CD CA, Aug 22, 2013), a California federal district court dismissed as frivolous an inmate's habeas corpus petition claiming that he had received a pardon from the Supreme pardoning authority of the Moorish Science Temple of America.In Barton v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:12 pm by Eugene K. Connors
Mark Temple and Peter Stuhldreher wrote a new post on Forbes.com about the Supreme Court's recent decision in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm by Joe Patrice
That’s cool, but I’ll stick to Temple Run, thanks. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:23 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 86645 (WD MI, June 20, 2013), while rejecting class action certification and damage claims, a Michigan federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with his injunctive action claim that "Moorish Science Temple of America-1928 Grand Body" should be recognized by prison authorities (and its practices accommodated) as a separate religious group from "Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc. (1934 Portion)".In Fabre v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:15 am by Howard Friedman
Edmondson, (10th Cir., June 17, 2013), the 10th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a complaint filed by an inmate who is a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America challenging an Oklahoma prison policy that prevents him from storing his fez in his cell.In Holland v. [read post]