Search for: "U. S. v. Range" Results 681 - 700 of 878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
In the 2004 version of the request, China requested a restriction on an extremely broad range of artifacts dating from “the paleolithic Period (75,000 B.C.) through to the end of the Qing Dynasty (1911 A.D.) [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
”  In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
Strojnik’s ability to keep a case alive and a broadening of his range of litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Lawson Fite
In her letter, Murphy claimed the governing statute, the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, “had little to offer in the current case,” and that “’[u]nfortunately, the statute provides no procedures or standards for this process. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:28 am by Larry Downes
Part V will review the legal basis on which the majority rests its authority for the rules, likely to be challenged in court. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s May, 2015 decision in Tibble v. [read post]