Search for: "U.S. v. Speed" Results 681 - 700 of 2,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Maryland, 373 U.S. 73 (1963). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Maryland, 373 U.S. 73 (1963). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:49 pm by Florian Mueller
[/Update]Since Apple and Samsung agreed in August to drop all patent infringement actions against each other outside the U.S., there has been a much lower frequency of Apple v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
At Legal Aggregate, Lisa Ouellette analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am by Rachel Bercovitz
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
In The National Law Journal, Tony Mauro reports that The Slants, the Asian-American rock band whose dispute with the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am by Samuel Bray
Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 433 (2009); Weinberger v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Pranay Vaddi
Second, even if the modernized Backfire’s range capability is less than 8,000 kilometers but it is used to carry Kinzhal, U.S. policymakers may still have a good argument that the aircraft should be limited as a “new kind” of strategic offensive armament under Article V of the treaty. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:59 am by smlangston
The announcement was made Monday at ULA headquarters in Centennial, Colo. “I am truly excited about the addition of ULA to NASA’s Commercial Crew Development Program team,” NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said. “Having ULA on board may speed the development of a commercial crew transportation system for the International Space Station, allowing NASA to concentrate its resources on exploring beyond low Earth orbit.” NASA and ULA’s unfunded Space Act… [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am by Florian Mueller
But, unfortunately, efficiency gains (reduced data volumes, increased processing speeds, economic use of screen space etc.) often serve as an excuse for circumventing Art. 52 EPC.Tomorrow the Munich I Regional Court will hold a first hearing in one of eight BlackBerry v. [read post]