Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES" Results 681 - 700 of 3,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 5:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Initially, the district court noted the old standard that, in a trademark case, irreparable harm is inherent in a showing of likely success on the merits, but held that Salinger v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:02 pm by Ronald Mann
We look for a rule that might be in conflict, that could be taken to be in conflict, with the jurisdictional provision. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:09 pm by Anna Bower
The court can always revisit the issue after the Fulton County district attorney receives and evaluates the transcript of Gingrich’s testimony, he says. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Plaintiffs pled the above claims in a complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:58 am
Plaintiffs moved to remand the class action to state court; the district court agreed with Fidelity that the class action fell within the scope of SLUSA and denied the motion. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
The District Court held that UPEPA did apply because the U.S. [read post]
”  The district court reasoned that the “public-nuisance claim raised issues relating to ‘interstate and intentional disputes implicating conflicting rights of States or . . . relations with foreign nations’ and that these issues had to be resolved pursuant to a uniform federal standard. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:04 pm by Michael D. Thompson
District Court for the Northern District of California, these security checks take approximately 50 minutes to 1.5 hours per week of uncompensated time to search for “possible store items or merchandise taken without permission and/or contraband. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
  However, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court’s ruling that Compaq did not infringe several claims of U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 5:04 pm by Lyle Roberts
  If so, the district court must dismiss the case; if not, the district court must remand the case back to state court. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 6:11 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
As a result, Sergeant Muldrow was reassigned to a uniformed position in its Fifth District. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:31 am
For twenty-one years, the state has failed to Court Administration / District Attorney Funding take steps to implement the rulings of the court, and this has been to the detriment of local taxpayers. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
” The district court had found that Davis did not meet this requirement because her claim for backpay monetary relief required an “individualized determination[]” that was not appropriate for a Rule 23(b)(2) class. [read post]