Search for: "US v. Harris"
Results 681 - 700
of 4,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 2:42 pm
This decision affected the adjacent commercial parcel owned by petitioner Jubilee Carolina, LLC, which had been granted a conditional use permit to construct a Harris Teeter grocery store on its property. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:59 pm
Simmons-Harris. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
Harris. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
This week on the legal-affairs podcast Lawyer2Lawyer, we discuss the recent Supreme Court decision Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:11 am
It is somewhat paradoxical, then, that the recent Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 5:19 pm
In a letter to the attorneys in Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:20 pm
The Tennessee Court of Appeals in the case of 4215 Harding Road Homeowners Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:54 pm
Harris Assocs. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Harris Co. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:31 am
Harris, 219 N.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:49 am
(Except for the “Stolen Valor Act” case, US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
[It] enabled Harris and his colleagues to monitor the activities of [Burgos]. . . . [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:19 am
Here’s news from Lisa Stark of Berger Harris: In Southern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:29 am
Cir. 2006); In re Harris, 409 F.3d 1339, 1341 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
I haven't been blogging a lot lately, in part because I've been waiting for decisions from the Supreme Court in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, Noel Canning, and Harris v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:31 pm
The Victims’ Bill of Rights for Ontario So 1995, c. 6 is seldom used Act for personal injury cases. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Ploski v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
The case The Medicines Company v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 6:29 am
In Glidepath Limited v. [read post]
