Search for: "US v. Holme"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[15] Two years later, in Bigelow v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
A katpat goes to Richard Holmes (Marks & Clerk) for spotting this item in the Washington Post on the ALS (that's amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) Association's plan to register the words "Ice bucket challenge" as a US trade mark. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 6:08 am
Goesel v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
Holmes, 2013 WL 501731 (Ohio Court of Appeals 2013). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:34 am
Klinger v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
” Frank v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm
El juez tenía facultades sancionatorias, y las usó a fondo: lo excluyó de la matrícula al abogado Bradley. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:36 am
Klinger v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Evans and United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am
” A friendly reminder: We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
The constitutionality of having scientists, or specially qualified judges, serve as fact finders has never been clearly addressed.[6] Other commentators have argued in favor of the existing set of judicial tools, such as appointment of testifying “neutral” expert witnesses and scientific advisors for trial judges.[7] These approaches have been generally available in federal and some state trial courts, but they have rarely been used. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
§ 229(a) for possession and use of a “chemical weapon. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:40 am
In this panel, a group of attorneys will discuss the impact of several cases that EFF has been tracking closely, including Tarantino v Gawker, the battle over whether Sherlock Holmes is in the public domain, and an appellate court’s decision to force YouTube to remove “The Innocence of Muslims. [read post]
