Search for: "US v. Strange"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The case is South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:29 pm
” Lawson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:48 pm
In a 1949 decision, Brinegar v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Bolton has also referred to federal campaign finance laws as an “overreact[ion]” to Watergate, and fought against them as counsel for the petitioners in Buckley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 11:56 am
Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
But the Supreme Court, in its 1977 decision in Zacchini v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:24 am
See, e.g., Demleitner, Nora V., et al. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:19 pm
What's the test she's using? [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently heard oral argument in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 10:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:34 am
It's a pretty complicated and strange-looking little legal animal that Mr. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
” Painter v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
” Painter v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:25 am
(Probably) *Not* a database right-inspired bandThe Database Directive has been around for a while, yet it is arguable that one of its crucial aspects, this being the sui generis (database) right, has remained somewhat ambiguous.Katfriend David Serras Pereira (SPAutores) reports on a recent SPanish decision concerning indeed the sui generis right.Here’s what David writes:“A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away....The Database Directive was adopted in March 1996, and not so… [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
I guess all’s well that ends well, but fair use analyses look strange when applied to microworks like this. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 3:30 pm
[Daily Caller] * Still on the subject of POTUS v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Ivy Tech or Zarda v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Ivy Tech or Zarda v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 7:18 pm
First, Schultz's assertion that the Constitution is a contract is not correct, as the Constitution is a set of rules that govern the basic functions of state government, and also sets forth individual rights that may be used to strike down laws. [read post]
