Search for: "United States v. Nixon" Results 681 - 700 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
  C-SPAN posts video of recent testimony by Justices Scalia and Breyer on the Administrative Conference of the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Brian Finucane
The United States and Kuwait agreed on a plan to reflag 11 vessels as American. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 2:09 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
This afternoon, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from investigations “related in any way to the campaigns for president of the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:42 am by Steve Hall
In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court used the words “obligation” and “debt” interchangeably. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Public Citizen argued our 60th case before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by INFORRM
” which points out that the Act is unnecessary as these judgments are never enforced in the United States in any event. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:14 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The balance here is strikingly parallel to what we saw in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As he well knows, such terms have very precise meaning under US law, and by that metric - one that's extremely favorable for American companies, by the way - only a small minority of Chinese imports into the United States are "unfairly traded. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second article of the House’s impeachment resolution charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:01 pm by Steve
"Well, now that's a little more direct, an administration official stating that the Fairness Doctrine was used to harass political opponents. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
See 18 U.S.C. 1505 ("Whoever corruptly . . . influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, . . . [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Since then, Judge Ginsburg has remained a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Mark Walsh
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:17 am by Maddie McMahon, Jack Goldsmith
Article II gives the president the “Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
As Graber notes, my political account ends with the resignation of Richard Nixon, and a lot has gone on since then. [read post]