Search for: "WILLIAMSON v. STATE" Results 681 - 700 of 971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed,… [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Carolene Products Co., supra, at 152; see also Williamson v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 938 A.2d 417 (Pa. 2007) (3-2 decision with two concurrences in the result), was not even cited in Maya. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
  See California Civil Discovery Practice, 4th Edition, (CEB 2019) §3.157A citing Williamson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
"Today's decision can only cause one to wonder which cases the Court will overrule next…" The next overrule came last week: a 5-4 decision along ideological lines that scrapped Williamson County v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
  The city relied upon the ripeness rule of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am by Eleonora Rosati
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 11:21 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, the Georgia Law Enforcement Handbook and the Official Code of Georgia that Investigator Burgamy used for his reference specifically stated that the criminal defamation statute "has been held unconstitutional in the case of Williamson versus State 1982. [read post]