Search for: "Walker v. United States" Results 681 - 700 of 1,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
Ultimately, United States District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker did not refer the matter for discipline, but the fact that a District Court Judge pondered the idea is interesting, to say the least. [read post]
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 10:37 pm
Cat out of the Bag Miranda: "Saleh also argues that the March 26 . . . statements should have been suppressed under the ‘cat out of the bag' theory set forth in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
The power is stricly limited, however, since the FISA rules state that there must be "no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:43 am by Marie Louise
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) BT flood warning to High Court – injunction to block access to Newzbin2 would be ‘thin edge of the wedge’ (1709 Blog) ISP survey: Three strikes won’t deter Pirates (TorrentFreak)   United States US General FTC launching antitrust probe over Google search, ad businesses (ArsTechnica) What would a Government-operated search engine look like in the US? [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Thinktank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) - US: Trial judge grants permanent injunction in case relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) patent: Amgen… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The government used it against him in proving that he unlawfully possessed a weapon.The case is United States v. [read post]