Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 6981 - 7000
of 13,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has given its stamp of approval to the forcible sterilization of “imbeciles,” concluding that “[t]hree generations of imbeciles are enough” in Buck v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:35 pm
Especially when you don't get the collector's version special cover art? [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:07 pm
State Bd. of Elections, 462 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2006). [2] N.Y. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
” Significantly, the Court pointedly rejected plaintiffs’ attempted reliance on an earlier court of appeal precedent for the asserted principle that “[f]ailure to comply with the CEQA procedures is necessarily prejudicial[,]” noting that statement “does not comport with either CEQA section 21005 or with the Supreme Court’s decision in Neighbors for Smart Rail [v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:01 am
It’s a question that can’t be easily answered, but is also unlikely to matter. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
MGA Entm’t, Inc., 637 F.3d 1314, 1321 (Fed. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:46 am
Ganier, 468 F.3d 920 (U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:51 am
Mount, 757 F.2d 1315, 1320 (D.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
Ryland Grp., Inc., 680 F.3d 1329, 1337 (11th Cir.2012); Florida Power Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
Corp., 213 F. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 10:45 am
In point of fact – the matter is far from clear. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 11:31 am
The Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in In re Engle Cases, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 4435893 (11th Cir. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
Those who study the matter have a number of likely examples.So? [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:01 pm
You may not deduct commuting expenses for school or work no matter how you choose to arrive. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
Stephens, 720 F.3d 231, 237-238 (2013) :Trottie and Barbara Canada met and began dating in about 1989. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 8:35 am
But on the main divisive matters, prolonged negotiations seemed only to harden the position of each side rather than facilitating compromise. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Meregildo, 883 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:43 pm
Post , __ F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
For reasons given in part 1 above, that inclusion shouldn’t be seen, even as a simple matter of statutory interpretation, as precluding a no-God affirmation. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
