Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 6981 - 7000 of 29,295
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
  The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
… Madison, going beyond the recommendations of the states and the constitution of his own state, phrased his own proposal to make it coextensive with the broadest practice.[3] Los originalistas pretendieron que el derecho a no incriminarse ostentara la misma importancia que otros derechos fundamentales consagrados en la Constitución. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am by John Duffy
First, while some of the dissent is a reiteration of complaints Gorsuch raised in his dissent two years ago in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, the First Congress debated whether to append successful amendments or to integrate their content into the original text. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Congress, we are reminded, does not "hide elephants in mouse-holes. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm by Derek T. Muller
Perhaps we want more robust federal statutes within Congress’s purview, or more express guidance from state legislatures. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:30 am by Orin S. Kerr
I blogged last week about the Supreme Court's pending cert petition in Van Buren v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:38 am by Eric A. Posner
The case is all the more striking because more than a century ago, in Jacobson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:05 am by Dennis Crouch
” Yet the dissent, despite the Court’s decision upholding the constitutionality of such review in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 7:50 am by David Oscar Markus
Along with Clarence Darrow, Dudley Field Malone defended John Scopes in the 1925 "Scopes Trial," formally known as State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Just as importantly, perhaps, states perturbed by the undoubtedly correct decision by the Supreme Court in Chisholm v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In spite of (or perhaps because of) the fact that the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion two weeks ago in the Wisconsin election case, Republican National Committee (RNC) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:06 pm by Michael Morley
Instead of, or in addition to, election-specific statutes, several states more broadly allow the governor to suspend state laws or statutory deadlines during declared states of emergency when necessary to protect human life. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  In addition to requiring two-thirds of both houses of Congress to adopt an amendment, and three-fourths of state legislatures to ratify it, Article V made the slave trade unamendable until 1808. [read post]