Search for: "State v. David" Results 6981 - 7000 of 14,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Eric Goldman
• Professor David Dana provides an overview of twelve recent decisions, all summarized in the edition. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:34 pm
 The Times reports that a lawyer by the name of David B. [read post]
30 May 2014, 2:49 am by Jon Gelman
The decision of Bellino v Verizon, 2014 WL 10301786 (NJ App Div 2014) is a factual situation that seem to draw the ire of many insurance companies and employers. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Thumbing nose at Hill, Interior Dept. moves to tribalize native Hawaiians by decree [Ilya Shapiro, NACRP, related PDF, Hawaii Free Press, also, background] Cellphone 911: “Safety Mandates That May Reduce Safety” [Coyote] Liability-expanding California decision: knowing breach of a material contractual provision may trigger state False Claims Act [Sidley] Plus Chamber’s ILR on state False Claims Acts and more; Feds to GM: write smoking-gun memos for trial… [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:39 pm
These laws were invalidated by a unanimous decision of the “conservative” Supreme Court in Buchanan v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Maintaining Sight of the Client This book analyzes the state of the law of privilege in Canada. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
III The usual suspects Guatemala’s Catholic clergy and its human rights groups have long enjoyed the reputation of David fighting Goliath. [read post]